About your Search

20120926
20121004
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4 (some duplicates have been removed)
the investigation. that's what the defense attorneys do. you have a bunch representing the jihadnist the department of law and they think it -- >> bob: you're suggesting -- [ overtalk ] >> bob: you are suggesting a complete and total amount of evidence available in-1/2 hours that confirmed, officially confirmed this was a terrorist attack? >> eric: they labeled it. fox news conditional label it. fox news is saying that the white house -- >> kimberly: the administration. >> eric: -- they told fox news -- >> bob: sources? >> eric: u.s. officials told fox news. they labeled it. >> bob: if you went to any intelligence group of people, everybody would have reached the same conclusion we did; that this was a terrorist attack. >> greg: i go back to original point. i can see bob's point there night not have been enough information. the assumption was made rather quickly that it was a spontaneous attack. where would it come from? it comes from the premise, that we deserved it. it couldn't an evil group of people that planned this. something we did pissed people off. that's what we accepted off the bat. to m
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4 (some duplicates have been removed)

Terms of Use (31 Dec 2014)